dogpossumtitle.jpg

May 31, 2005

private talk in public? hell yes!

I’d like to write a clever blog about public and private talk in blogs. But I don’t have time. I’m off to yoga in a tick, and then to a fillum.
But I will offer you links to some interesting background reading, to see what’s prompted this…
this thread on swingtalk, no doubt in response to a little scuffle over with the crinkler.

quite frankly, if little whingey boys can't hack people expressing their exasperation online in a blog or other public places, why the fuck should we have to deal with it?!

but i've no time to go into it here. though i'd dealy like to. i have some opinions about manipulative child-men and other wastes of good feminists' time.

Posted by Dogpossum on May 31, 2005 06:03 PM
Comments

there wasn't anything to see!
we didn't even get to do anything to warrant the sooking!
at least you get to shout and swear and use caps locks. all i got to do was ignore some sulky-child emails!

but it did prompt some interesting ideas about public talk online...

Posted by: dogpossum at June 3, 2005 04:15 PM

i missed it all, was it good?

wheres the beef?

SKENVOY RULES!

--Skenvoy

Posted by: Skenny at June 1, 2005 08:07 PM

and you and you thought it was bad yesterday... things continue today...

my favourite part of this has been the ongoing _private_ harassment from fukwits. yay. way to go team.

but i think i'll continue and write the post i had intended last night...

i'll call you dood, and we'll be nice to each other in reward for our own excellence in the face of adversity.

Posted by: dogpossum at June 1, 2005 12:35 PM

sadly in response to childish antics of today i have chosen to take most of blog down. i've not been able to post in the thread as i;m fucking busy with uni shit. it's the end of fucking semester!! i'm stressed already, i dont need this shit. plus i dont want to post out of anger as i'm still highly peeved.
what i really dont understand is: what the point of that thread was? what does it prove? why quote directly from my blog if not in direct reference to me? you've deducted links to certain people and prior events but i'm not entirely sure.
for fucks sake, honestly it's none of their damn business! i dont give a rats ass if they have blogs or not and what they might be posting on them, it's not worth my time to worry about such frivalties (?). so what's all the fuss about? i'm sick to death of this shit.
respect for such people was lost a long time ago. is it possible to go into respect-debt?

Posted by: crinkler at June 1, 2005 01:00 AM