this site is looking somewhat decent again. i can get back to responding to comments and things again.
perhaps.
we'll see. something interesting was posted on swing talk lately, which i would like to respond to. if you click that link and read marcusescano's latest post, you'll see the stuff i'm talking about.
it's interesting for a number of reasons, from a discussion of what constitutes a 'recently more experienced' dancer, through to marcus' comments in light of his professed unfamiliarity with vintage dance clips.
There are so many interesting ideas in the local classes and workshops of recent times. Josh and Noni talking about bounce and lead/follow movement within the context of 1-2 beats instead of 1-6/1-8 beats. Dan and Christi with moves based on the very odd connection of the lead's left hand to the follow's left hand. Scott and Claudia teaching very connection based simple movements, like both of you in closed leaning your centres back (is this "counterweight"?) then the lead moving the follow's centre around in that footworkless closed position.Calling all of this just "moves" understates how useful it is to lead/follow.
I watch few vintage clips and am not at all familiar with vintage social dance, so I have to ask if the sort of things I just described got as much attention in the old days as the old school stuff dogpossum described did?
but i'll get into that in more detail later...
Posted by Dogpossum on March 25, 2005 04:14 PM